On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 06:23:47PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:26:20PM +0000, Grant Likely wrote: > > I'll get right to the point: Can we please have this series queued up > > for v3.20? > Before you even ask for this, please look at the patches and realise > that there is a complete lack of Reviewed-by tags on the code (well, > apart from trivial Kconfig changes). In addition, the series touches on > other subsystems like clocksource, irqchip, acpi and I don't see any > acks from the corresponding maintainers. So even if I wanted to merge > the series, there is no way it can be done without additional > reviews/acks. On the document (last patch), I'd like to see a statement There's probably a bit of a process problem here - these patches are all being posted as part of big and apparently controversial threads with subject lines in the form "ARM / ACPI:" so people could be forgiven for just not even reading the e-mails enough to notice changes to their subsystems. Is it worth posting those patches separately more directly to the relevant maintainers?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
