On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 05:02:05PM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote: > On 18/11/14 16:57, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 04:43:13PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote: > >> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 01:45:49PM +0000, Hanjun Guo wrote: > >>> On 2014年10月17日 21:36, Hanjun Guo wrote: > >>>> It always make sense to initialize CPU0's logical map entry from the > >>>> hardware values, so move the initialization of cpu_logical_map(0) > >>>> before unflatten_device_tree() which is needed by ACPI code later. > >>>> > >>>> Acked-by: Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx> > >>>> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>> > >>> Could you merge this patch first in 3.19? It was acked by Olof and > >>> Mark, and it will make sense without ACPI too. > >> > >> I think it can go in for 3.19 (it's Will's turn this time ;)). > > > > This patch doesn't apply on for-next/core, as it conflicts with some of > > Rutland's rework ("arm64: log physical ID of boot CPU"). > > > > It's actually not required anymore, as "arm64: log physical ID of boot > CPU" move it quite early in the sequence from setup_arch to > smp_setup_processor_id while this patch just moves it up in setup_arch. Thanks Sudeep, I'd guessed as much :) Will -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html