Hi Darren, Thanks for the comments. I will send a new version with more information. I believe it is better to have a new driver as it seems OEM can depreciate and (probably is depreciating) old features and existing IDs. Especially, a lot of BIOS features are moving to be handled by OS and userspace applications. I expect to see more simple ACPI devices to be handled by simple drivers. Combining devices with different purposes into a single complex driver can be misleading. Hi Matthew, Thanks for clarifying it for me. Cheers, Alex Hung On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 3:35 AM, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 10:12:42PM -0800, Darren Hart wrote: > >> As this is ACPI enumerated, does it belong in drivers/platform and not in >> drivers/acpi? > > Yeah, it's still a platform driver rather than a core ACPI driver. > > -- > Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Cheers, Alex Hung -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
