On Friday, November 07, 2014 10:28:23 AM Darren Hart wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 01:47:19AM +0200, Giedrius Statkevicius wrote:
> > Remove a variable because it only holds the results of a function call
> > and then gets returned so instead just return the result of a function
> > call.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Giedrius Statkevičius <giedriuswork@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/platform/x86/hp-wireless.c | 5 +----
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/hp-wireless.c b/drivers/platform/x86/hp-wireless.c
> > index 415348f..670c62b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/hp-wireless.c
> > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/hp-wireless.c
> > @@ -82,10 +82,7 @@ static void hpwl_notify(struct acpi_device *acpi_dev, u32 event)
> >
> > static int hpwl_add(struct acpi_device *device)
> > {
> > - int err;
> > -
> > - err = hp_wireless_input_setup();
> > - return err;
> > + return hp_wireless_input_setup();
>
> Since acpi_device_probe() does not print a warning if add() fails, it might be
> preferable to print the message here, rather than ignoring it completely.
>
> Rafael?
Sounds reasonable.
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
