On Tuesday, November 04, 2014 03:04:54 PM Grant Likely wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Mika Westerberg
> <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 02:18:26PM +0000, Grant Likely wrote:
> >> > - strncpy(chip->name, np->name, sizeof(chip->name));
> >> > + strncpy(chip->name, "at25", sizeof(chip->name));
> >>
> >> This line changes behaviour of the driver. It's possibly not a problem,
> >> but it should be commented on and whether any due diligance has been
> >> done to make sure it there isn't anything that depends on it.
> >
> > I found only one user for "atmel,at25" in any of the DT sample files.
> >
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/phy3250.dts:
> >
> > eeprom: at25@0 {
> > ...
> > at25,byte-len = <0x8000>;
> > at25,addr-mode = <2>;
> > at25,page-size = <64>;
> >
> > compatible = "atmel,at25";
> > reg = <0>;
> > spi-max-frequency = <5000000>;
> > };
> >
> > I think np->name is "at25" in this case? The binding file
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/at25.txt also has the same name.
> >
> > Are you OK, if we add something like below to the changelog?
> >
> > In addition we hard-code the name of the chip to be "at25" for the
> > reason that there is no common mechanism to fetch name of the firmware
> > node. The only existing user (arch/arm/boot/dts/phy3250.dts) uses the
> > same name so it should continue to work.
>
> Yes. If somebody complains, then we can reinstate the previous
> behaviour, but assume it isn't necessary for now.
OK, done in my tree. I've added the ACK too, but that still is in my
bleeding-edge branch for now until it gets build tested and I can
pull http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=141505792126265&w=4 from
somewhere. :-)
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
