On Monday, October 20, 2014 04:05:01 PM Grant Likely wrote: > On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 14:05:59 +0200 > , "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > We have lots of existing Device Tree enabled drivers and allocating > > separate _HID for each is not feasible. Instead we allocate special _HID > > "PRP0001" that means that the match should be done using Device Tree > > compatible property using driver's .of_match_table instead if the driver > > is missing .acpi_match_table. > > (Not a critique of this patch, but merely a helpful comment; my previous > ack remains intact) :-) > > It would be useful for the code to point at some document that describes > the semantics of the PRP0001 binding. Well, we need to create that document in the first place. :-) I'd prefer to wait with that until the thing settles, however. Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
