On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 11:49:45PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, October 17, 2014 05:40:07 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 02:01:33PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > Hi Everyone, > > > > > > Hving had a couple of chats with Grant and Arnd during LinuxCon EU/LPC, we > > > now have version 5 taking all feedback into account (hopefully). > > > > > > Changes have been made to patch [02/12] and to patches [09-12/12], although > > > in patches [10-12/12] they are fairly minor. I have retained the Greg's > > > ACK on patch [02/12], because it is essentially the same that have been > > > posted aleady and ACKed by him (Greg, please let me know if I shouldn't > > > do that) and all the ACKs on the remaining patches except for patch [09/12] > > > which is substantially different. Still, if reviewers think that their > > > ACKs don't apply any more, please let me know and I'll remove them. > > > > No objection from me to keep my ACK on those patches, thanks for asking. > > Well, that's just fair IMO. :-) > > Does [09/12] look good too in particular? Yes, I have no objections to it. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
