On Friday, October 17, 2014 02:01:33 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > Hving had a couple of chats with Grant and Arnd during LinuxCon EU/LPC, we > now have version 5 taking all feedback into account (hopefully). > > Changes have been made to patch [02/12] and to patches [09-12/12], although > in patches [10-12/12] they are fairly minor. I have retained the Greg's > ACK on patch [02/12], because it is essentially the same that have been > posted aleady and ACKed by him (Greg, please let me know if I shouldn't > do that) and all the ACKs on the remaining patches except for patch [09/12] > which is substantially different. Still, if reviewers think that their > ACKs don't apply any more, please let me know and I'll remove them. > > Patch [02/12] now contains helper functions for all proprerty data types > that can be accessed which call the existing of_ functions, because Grant > preferred that. > > Patch [09/12] introduces quite a new concept, which is the struct fwnode_handle > structure containing one field (type) and embedded in struct device_node > (type==FWNODE_OF) and struct acpi_device (type==FWNODE_ACPI). In short, if > we are passed a struct fwnode_handle pointer, we can get from it to the > appropriate device node pointer (either struct acpi_device or struct device_node) > using container_of() after we've checked the type. This is needed for the code > that needs to access child nodes of a device in case when they don't have > struct device representations (whatever the reason). This has been suggested > by Grant and pretty much everyone involved agrees that it's better that the > alternatives presented so far. While at it, many thanks to Mika for testing the patches on MinnowBoard 1 and MinnowBoard Max and fixing build problems with them while we've been having fun at the conferences! I wouldn't have been able to prepare the patchset for posting without that work. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html