On Thu, 09 Oct 2014, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 09:00:48AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, 06 Oct 2014, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > --- a/drivers/mfd/ab8500-sysctrl.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/mfd/ab8500-sysctrl.c
> > > @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > +static int ab8500_power_off(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long unused1,
> > > + void *unused2)
> > > {
> > > sigset_t old;
> > > sigset_t all;
> > > @@ -34,11 +36,6 @@ static void ab8500_power_off(void)
> > > struct power_supply *psy;
> > > int ret;
> > >
> > > - if (sysctrl_dev == NULL) {
> > > - pr_err("%s: sysctrl not initialized\n", __func__);
> > > - return;
> > > - }
> >
> > Can you explain the purpose of this change please?
>
> I guess it's because the sysctrl_dev is already initialised when
> registering the power_off handler, so there isn't a way to call the
> above function with a NULL sysctrl_dev. Probably even with the original
> code you didn't need this check (after some race fix in
> ab8500_sysctrl_remove but races is one of the things Guenter's patches
> try to address).
Sounds reasonable, although I think this change should be part of
another patch.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
