On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 11:10:23AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 2:14 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > @@ -301,35 +301,33 @@ static ssize_t at25_mem_write(struct memory_accessor *mem, const char *buf,
> >
> > /*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
> >
> > -static int at25_np_to_chip(struct device *dev,
> > - struct device_node *np,
> > - struct spi_eeprom *chip)
> > +static int at25_fw_to_chip(struct device *dev, struct spi_eeprom *chip)
> > {
> > u32 val;
> >
> > memset(chip, 0, sizeof(*chip));
> > - strncpy(chip->name, np->name, sizeof(chip->name));
> > + strncpy(chip->name, "at25", sizeof(chip->name));
>
> So this changes chip->name from "eeprom" (or whatever name the DTS
> writer used; "eeprom" is the ePAPR-compliant name) to "at25"?
Yes.
Is there something depending on that name?
> Note:The example in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/at25.txt
> uses "at25", not "eeprom".
Which is the same we use here.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
