On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 02:10:56AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > This is version 4 of the unified device properties interface patchset. > > The original cover letter from Mika is here: > > http://marc.info/?l=devicetree&m=141087052200600&w=4 > > My cover letter for version 3 is here: > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-acpi&m=141212903816560&w=4 > > One major change from the previous iteration is that now we will > use the "compatible" property to match drivers to devices having > "PRP0001" as their _HID, so for example the at25 driver doesn't > have to add the extra ACPI match table as part of the conversion > to the unified interface (patch [05/13] in this series). > > The second major change is that I've split the driver core patch > in two, where the first one ([02/13]) does not contain any stuff > related to iterating over the child nodes of a given device. > Accordingly, the whole patch series has been rearranged so that > the relatively non-controversial patches [01-09/13], most of which > have been ACKed already, go first and then goes the second driver > core patch ([10/13]) and the other patches related to it. > > In patches [10-13/13] I used the Arnd's suggestion to implement > device_for_each_child_node() as a macro which makes the changes > in patches [12-13/13] look more straightforward among other things. > > I've retained the Greg's ACKs on patches [02/13] and [10/13], because > the first of them is things ACKed by Greg only and the change in the > second one is just an implementation detail in my opinion (Greg, please > let me know if that's inappropriate). No objection from me, looks good. greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
