On Tuesday, September 30, 2014 01:58:14 PM Darren Hart wrote: > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 08:40:09PM -0600, Azael Avalos wrote: > > Currently the HCI/SCI read/write functions are returning > > the status of the ACPI call and also assigning the > > returned value of the HCI/SCI function, however, only > > the HCI/SCI status is being checked. > > > > This patch changes such functions, returning the value > > of the HCI/SCI function instead of the ACPI call status, > > eliminating one parameter, and returning something > > useful that indeed is being checked. > > > > Signed-off-by: Azael Avalos <coproscefalo@xxxxxxxxx> > > Cc linux-acpi > > Rafael, > > This follows a couple patches renaming interfaces and error codes. While > there is some information to be had in checking for ACPI specific errors, I > don't think it's significant to warrant asking Azael to go the other way and > check for them specifically and add errorcodes to the interface rather than > cleanup the functionality as it stands today and simplifiy the code as he does > here. > > Any objection? Nope. -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
