On Thursday, September 25, 2014 10:07:44 AM Li, Aubrey wrote:
> On 2014/9/25 4:32, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Wednesday, September 24, 2014 11:19:22 PM Fu, Zhonghui wrote:
> >> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> >> --------------040808000309050202010005
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> >> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> >>
> >>
> >> On 2014/9/23 7:17, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>> On Monday, September 22, 2014 10:45:42 PM Fu, Zhonghui wrote:
> >>> [cut]
> >>>
> >>>>>>> This operation is reading data from Operation Region of one operand object in name space. I don't know the reason of hang at this point. Could you please give out some explanation about this?
> >>>>>> I don't know the exact reason why this particular read hangs, but this means
> >>>>>> that, perhaps, instead of disabling async suspend/resume for all LPSS devices
> >>>>>> altogether, perhaps we can serialize their acpi_dev_resume_early()?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Rafael
> >>>>> Do you mean keeping other phases(prepare, suspend, suspend_late, suspend_noirq, resume_noirq, resume, complete) of suspend/resume asynchronous, and only serializing "resume_early" phase for all LPSS devices?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>> Zhonghui
> >>>> Hi, Rafael
> >>>>
> >>>> Could you please confirm my understanding?
> >>> This is not what I meant.
> >>>
> >>> Since we have a PM domain for the LPSS devices already, why don't we add an
> >>> internal lock to that PM domain and acquire it over executing either
> >>> acpi_dev_suspend_late() (during suspend) or acpi_dev_resume_early() (during
> >>> resume) for all of them?
> >> I seem find the root cause of this issue. Because this "hang" issue is occurred on ASUS T100(Baytrail-T platform), so I checked its DSDT and found that URT and I2C controllers depend on(_DEP) PEPD device(description in Windows is "power engine plug-in"). That is, URT and I2C controllers can not transition to ACPI_STATE_D0 state until PEPD device has completed this transition during resuming. But, the ACPI subsystem in the 3.16 kernel doesn't support "_DEP" feature. So, if enabling async suspend/resume for LPSS devices, their "_DEP" relationship with PEPD device will be broken and incur "hang" during the transition to ACPI_STATE_D0, please see the following code, it is from dpm_resume_early function in drivers/base/power/main.c file:
> >>
> >> list_for_each_entry(dev, &dpm_late_early_list, power.entry) {
> >> reinit_completion(&dev->power.completion);
> >> if (is_async(dev)) {
> >> get_device(dev);
> >> async_schedule(async_resume_early, dev);
> >> }
> >> }
> >>
> >> while (!list_empty(&dpm_late_early_list)) {
> >> dev = to_device(dpm_late_early_list.next);
> >> get_device(dev);
> >> list_move_tail(&dev->power.entry, &dpm_suspended_list);
> >> mutex_unlock(&dpm_list_mtx);
> >>
> >> if (!is_async(dev)) { // PEPD is not configured as async device now.
> >> int error;
> >>
> >> error = device_resume_early(dev, state, false);
> >> if (error) {
> >> suspend_stats.failed_resume_early++;
> >> dpm_save_failed_step(SUSPEND_RESUME_EARLY);
> >> dpm_save_failed_dev(dev_name(dev));
> >> pm_dev_err(dev, state, " early", error);
> >> }
> >> }
> >> mutex_lock(&dpm_list_mtx);
> >> put_device(dev);
> >> }
> >>
> >>
> >> Based on the above analysis,I move the resume_early operation of PEPD device to head of dpm_resume_early function and "hang" did not occur any more during resuming(I tested this 10 times).
> >>
> >> If disabling async suspend/resume for LPSS devices, PEPD device will be prior to UART and I2C controllers in dpm_late_early_list list and the "_DEP" relationship can be kept. Maybe,the "_DEP" ACPI feature will be supported in future kernel, so, I think simply disabling async suspend/resume for LPSS devices is a acceptable workaround now, and need not add new mechanism to deal with this issue.
> >>
> >> BTW, I will take two week's leave and can't reply email during this time. Sorry.
> >
> > OK, thanks for the analysis. In that case we really may be better off by
> > disabling the runtime PM of LPSS devices for now until we figure out how this
> > can be addressed properly.
>
> Please let me know if the patch need to be refined, I can do it before
> October 1st, then one-week Chinese National holiday.
The patch is fine. In fact, I'm going to push it to Linus shortly.
> Besides this patch, we leave the non-LPSS devices as async
> suspend/resume, the risk is unknown.
No, we don't in general. That is an opt-in, usually on a per-subsystem basis.
> I wonder if we need to make
> pm_async parameter configurable thru kernel command line to make android
> userspace happy?
There is a sysfs switch for disabling async suspend/resume (/sys/power/pm_async).
That has to suffice.
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
