On 2014/9/24 14:55, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
> (2014/09/11 23:03), Jiang Liu wrote:
>> +static void irq_domain_free_irq_data(unsigned int virq, unsigned int nr_irqs)
>> +{
>> + int i;
>> + struct irq_data *irq_data, *tmp;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < nr_irqs; i++) {
>
>> + irq_data = irq_get_irq_data(virq + i);
>> + tmp = irq_data->parent_data;
>
> Why don't you care NULL condition?
Yeah, there's an explicitly assumption that, irq_get_irq_data()
always return valid pointer once we have allocated the irq number
and associated irq_desc. If preferred, I will add a check here.
>
>> + irq_data->parent_data = NULL;
>> + irq_data->domain = NULL;
>> +
>> + while (tmp) {
>> + irq_data = tmp;
>> + tmp = tmp->parent_data;
>> + kfree(irq_data);
>> + }
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int irq_domain_alloc_irq_data(struct irq_domain *domain,
>> + unsigned int virq, unsigned int nr_irqs)
>> +{
>> + int i;
>> + struct irq_data *irq_data;
>> + struct irq_domain *parent;
>> +
>> + /* The outmost irq_data is embedded in struct irq_desc */
>> + for (i = 0; i < nr_irqs; i++) {
>
>
>> + irq_data = irq_get_irq_data(virq + i);
>> + irq_data->domain = domain;
>
> ditto.
Seems as above.
Regards!
Gerry
>
> Thanks,
> Yasuaki Ishimatsu
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
