On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 09:52:21 AM Felipe Balbi wrote: > On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 04:52:01PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 03:17:12 PM Heikki Krogerus wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 02:55:26PM +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote: > > > > Most devices are configured for 32-bit DMA addresses. > > > > Setting the mask to 32-bit here removes the need for the > > > > drivers to do it separately. > > > > > > Rafael, is this OK? > > > > Fine by me, but it should go in via dwc3 I think. > > huh ? Seems like there's no direct dependency. Well, it's part of a series where all of the other patches touch dwc3. Doesn't anything in that series depend on this patch? -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.