On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 06:34:42 AM Hanjun Guo wrote: > On Sep 23, 2014, 06:28AM, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 12:46:24AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> On Monday, September 22, 2014 09:31:36 PM Matthew Garrett wrote: > >>> Explicit Change Request. These can only be filed by paid-up members of > >>> the UEFI Forum, so I suspect this requirement is going to be unworkable > >>> (there's plenty of ACPI support code for large x86 vendors which isn't > >>> part of any ACPI spec). > >> Why do you think so? > > The IP rules in the membership agreements. > > If I'm not mistaken, I think there is no IP issues for the _DSD bindings, > it just some key value pairs. Well, if we are talking about the bindings themselves only, then as I said previously that would be a hosted document rather than a UEFI specification anyway, so I don't see how the "IP rules in the membership agreements" would apply to that in any case. -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
