On 2014年09月18日 04:11, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wednesday, September 17, 2014 08:22:59 PM Matthew Garrett wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 09:37:42PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> >>> There are no implied IP issues with using the information there I know of and >>> if there's any fine print anywhere that may suggest so, please let me know. >> Using the information should be fine, but my understanding of the UEFI >> forum rules is that any submissions to UEFI specs must be from UEFI >> forum members - there are concerns around accidentally including >> patented material. > The documents in question are not regarded as UEFI specs, however. They > are just hosted by UEFI. > >> The easy way around this is just for the bindings to >> be managed outside UEFI. > Again, there's a difference between UEFI material and the UEFI hosting > something (but not maintaining it). > > In principle, the bindings could be hosted by UEFI, but maintained by > community members. Thanks for the clarify, I totally agree with you, that's how things work now for such doc hosted by UEFI. For now, _DSD will use the same binding as DT, is there any chance that _DSD will introduce new bindings? if yes, how can we handle it? Thanks Hanjun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
