On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 04:58:10AM -0400, Jon Masters wrote: > On 09/16/2014 09:44 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote: > >> +http://www.uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/_DSD-implementation-guide-toplevel.htm > > How are individuals/companies who aren't UEFI members supposed to do > > this? Aren't there IP issues involved in taking submissions from > > non-members? > Obviously, I'm not a lawyer, but I would note that the _DSD bindings > aren't going into the core ACPI document. I think the specifics for non > members of the UEFI to potentially contribute bindings need to be > addressed. That said, at this point, the population of the UEFI forum is > very well aligned with initial players (that this is the case is not > entirely an accident, I went around to a few folks a year or so ago and > made sure that they had become members in anticipation of this issue). Are you sure you've covered all the vendors of off-SoC components who might be involved? That's certainly already an issue with people doing x86 machines (who aren't being bound by this spec but as a subsystem maintainer how am I supposed to tell if the target is an ARM or x86 system?).
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
