On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 02:44:10AM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 10:00:16PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote: > > +No code shall be accepted into the kernel unless it complies with the released > > +standards from UEFI ASWG. If there are features missing from ACPI to make it > > +function on a platform, ECRs should be submitted to ASWG and go through the > > +approval process. > > Similar question here. Is the expectation that all ARM vendors will > become UEFI contributors? I should also add that this is inconsistent with how we've managed things in the x86 world - there's a great deal of ACPI functionality implemented that's not covered in the spec. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
