On Sun, 14 Sep 2014 23:40:10 -0700, Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 10:00:08PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote: > > When MADT is parsed, print GIC information to make the boot > > log look pretty. > > If you do this for prettiness, having an example output in the commit > message would be a nice touch. Agreed. > The question is why it's needed though? Do we really need all this verbose > information in dmesg when it could be found out in other ways instead? > > x86 is notoriously verbose in some of these aspects, I'm not sure it's > something we need to mimic here? For consistency, it does make sense to have the common x86 and ARM64 code outputing information in the same way, so I think the patch still makes sense. All of them could be moved to KERN_DEBUG as a separate patch if we want to cull early boot output. I would split that off and discuss it separately. g. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
