On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 07:38:08AM +0100, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 10:00:07PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> > +static int __init acpi_parse_fadt(struct acpi_table_header *table)
> > +{
> > + struct acpi_table_fadt *fadt = (struct acpi_table_fadt *)table;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Revision in table header is the FADT Major revision,
> > + * and there is a minor revision of FADT which was introduced
> > + * by ACPI 5.1, we only deal with ACPI 5.1 or higher revision
> > + * to get arm boot flags, or we will disable ACPI.
> > + */
> > + if (table->revision > 5 ||
> > + (table->revision == 5 && fadt->minor_revision >= 1))
> > + return 0;
>
> The commend and code disagree. The code says 5.1 or newer, while the comment say
> _only_ 5.1. One or the other needs to change.
I don't think the comment and code disagree, it says "we only deal with
ACPI 5.1 _or_ higher revision".
But since you mention it and following my other thread with Grant, I
think at least for now we should make this check 5.1 only.
--
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
