Re: [PATCH] ACPI / platform / LPSS: disable async suspend/resume of LPSS devices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



hi, Rafael

Sorry for late response.

Yes,Only removing the "enable" line is sufficient. I have verified this, and made a new patch as follows.

Thanks,
Zhonghui

>From 3c89c22c5b35ddbdcadecd391f2521a15ffc2f4f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fu Zhonghui <zhonghui.fu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2014 01:26:04 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] ACPI / platform / LPSS: disable async suspend/resume of LPSS devices

LPSS devices must suspend/resume in fixed order. Or some LPSS devices
will hang during the transition to ACPI_STATE_D0 state.

Signed-off-by: Li Aubrey <aubrey.li@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Fu Zhonghui <zhonghui.fu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c |    1 -
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c
index fddc1e8..b0ea767 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c
@@ -419,7 +419,6 @@ static int acpi_lpss_create_device(struct acpi_device *adev,
 	adev->driver_data = pdata;
 	pdev = acpi_create_platform_device(adev);
 	if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(pdev)) {
-		device_enable_async_suspend(&pdev->dev);
 		return 1;
 	}
 
-- 1.7.1



On 2014/9/9 21:17, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 09, 2014 01:36:48 PM Fu, Zhonghui wrote:
>> From 6deb00230f5df68da3ca7490402a0c537bf386bb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Fu Zhonghui <zhonghui.fu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 13:02:25 +0800
>> Subject: [PATCH] ACPI / platform / LPSS: disable async suspend/resume of LPSS devices
>>
>> LPSS devices must suspend/resume in fixed order. Or some LPSS devices
>> will hang during the transition to ACPI_STATE_D0 state.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Li Aubrey <aubrey.li@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Fu Zhonghui <zhonghui.fu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c |    2 +-
>>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c
>> index fddc1e8..54e5c97 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c
>> @@ -419,7 +419,7 @@ static int acpi_lpss_create_device(struct acpi_device *adev,
>>  	adev->driver_data = pdata;
>>  	pdev = acpi_create_platform_device(adev);
>>  	if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(pdev)) {
>> -		device_enable_async_suspend(&pdev->dev);
>> +		device_disable_async_suspend(&pdev->dev);
> Removing the "enable" line should be sufficient for that.  Isn't it?
>
>>  		return 1;
>>  	}
>>  
>> -- 1.7.1
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux