On 11/09/14 17:06, Graeme Gregory wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 04:57:24PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
[...]
This what we have suggested in past especially for this S-state support.
Currently the core acpi code compiles in sleep support unconditionally.
That doesn't mean we need to do the same on ARM64, we can easily make
sure that's not enabled for ARM64 until we have clarification on how to
support them on ARM in ACPI specification.
I just pointed out at one "out of spec" workaround done for x86
"unconditionally" in the code just to tell that it won't work on ARM.
That shouldn't be misunderstood as demand for refactoring as we have no
clue how S-state would look on ARM to take up any such task.
For the sleep.c case I worked on this and sent some updates to Hanjun so
it should be compiled out in the next version of the patches.
Thanks Graeme, that's much better than any hooks/stubs which might fail
depending on ACPI table contents.
Regards,
Sudeep
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
