On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 11:23:21AM -0400, Ashwin Chaugule wrote: > On 2 September 2014 19:03, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > As previously suggested just looking things up in the context of a > > device created to represent the PCC controller seems fine; clients know > > they're using PCC so can just call a PCC specific API which hides the > > mechanics from them (for example, using a global variable to store the > > device). > IIUC, this means, either modifying the existing > mbox_controller_register() to know when a PCC mbox is being added, or > have another PCC specific API for registering as a mailbox? Then, in Why would you have to do that - can't the PCC specific API manage to hide this?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
