On Friday, August 29, 2014 04:42:34 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Now IOAPIC driver dynamically allocates IRQ numbers for IOAPIC pins. > > We need to keep IRQ assignment for PCI devices during runtime power > > management, otherwise it may cause failure of device wakeups. > > > > Commit 3eec595235c17a7 "x86, irq, PCI: Keep IRQ assignment for PCI > > devices during suspend/hibernation" has fixed the issue for suspend/ > > hibernation, we also need the same fix for runtime device sleep too. > > > > Fix: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83271 > > Reported-and-Tested-by: EmanueL Czirai <amanual@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > arch/x86/include/asm/io_apic.h | 2 ++ > > arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c | 12 ++++++++++++ > > arch/x86/pci/intel_mid_pci.c | 2 +- > > arch/x86/pci/irq.c | 2 +- > > drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c | 4 ++++ > > 5 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/io_apic.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/io_apic.h > > index 0aeed5ca356e..478c490f3654 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/io_apic.h > > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/io_apic.h > > @@ -227,6 +227,8 @@ static inline void io_apic_modify(unsigned int apic, unsigned int reg, unsigned > > > > extern void io_apic_eoi(unsigned int apic, unsigned int vector); > > > > +extern bool mp_should_keep_irq(struct device *dev); > > + > > #else /* !CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC */ > > > > #define io_apic_assign_pci_irqs 0 > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c > > index 29290f554e79..1e9a921d9701 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c > > @@ -3946,6 +3946,18 @@ int mp_set_gsi_attr(u32 gsi, int trigger, int polarity, int node) > > return ret; > > } > > > > +bool mp_should_keep_irq(struct device *dev) > > +{ > > + if (dev->power.is_prepared) > > + return true; > > +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME > > + if (dev->power.runtime_status == RPM_SUSPENDING) > > + return true; > > +#endif > > No, you can't do that. It is racy and incorrect. Well, maybe not. > Please give me some time for looking into this. So I guess the intended check is "Am I running in a suspend callback"? Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
