On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 10:55:12AM -0700, Jacob Pan wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Aug 2014 09:53:58 +0300
> Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > From: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Make use of device property API in this driver so that both OF based
> > system and ACPI based system can use this driver.
> >
> Do we always assume OF and ACPI _DSD will have the same property name
> strings? i.e. in this patch "gpios"
> > + if (device_property_get(dev, "gpios", NULL)) {
> > - if (!of_find_property(pp, "gpios", NULL)) {
>
> Maybe i missed something, but I don't think we can make that assumption
> in BIOS. If not, what is the point of having unified interface?
We recommend that when it makes sense, the property names in _DSD follow
the corresponding DT names.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
