Hi,
On 07/16/2014 09:19 AM, Aaron Lu wrote:
> On 07/16/2014 02:29 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 07/16/2014 02:43 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, July 15, 2014 10:45:29 PM Aaron Lu wrote:
>>>> On 07/15/2014 10:05 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>>
>>> [cut]
>>>
>>>>> On 07/15/2014 04:00 PM, Aaron Lu wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> > If we have to consider the following config:
>>>>> > 1 ACPI backlight interface works(or can work with some cmdline option);
>>>>>
>>>>> And the BIOS advertises native win8 support.
>>>>
>>>> Right.
>>>> So this condition should be:
>>>> 1 ACPI backlight interface works in Win8 mode;
>>>>
>>>> This means, for Julian's system, the commit 751109aad583 doesn't need to
>>>> be reverted as the ACPI backlight interface on his system only works
>>>> when the acpi_osi="!Windows 2012" is added. In that case, the
>>>> video.use_native_backlight=X doesn't make any difference anymore.
>>>
>>> But Julian reports that he needs to revert that commit to make things work
>>> as before for him. What gives?
>>
>> Likely what is happening is that this commit is still affecting Julian because
>> we check if the bios is advertising win8 support, not if we are advertising win8
>> support ourselves.
>
> Perhaps the firmware on Julian's laptop has _OSI("Windows 2013") and if that
> is the case, the acpi_gbl_osi_data will still get the value of ACPI_OSI_WIN_8
> and acpi_osi_is_win8() will return true...
>
> Julian,
> Please attach your acpidump, thanks.
>
>>
>> Julian, I've jumped into this thread halfway, so I'm not 100% clear on your
>> original problem. From what I've read sofar you need acpi_osi="!Windows 2012"
>> for backlight control to work. That in itself is a sign that things are not
>> as they should be, and this is actually what the new default of
>> video.use_native_backlight=1 is trying to fix.
>>
>> If you boot the new kernel without acpi_osi="!Windows 2012" and without
>> video.use_native_backlight=X (so using the new default of
>> video.use_native_backlight=1), what does ls /sys/class/backlight say then ?
>>
>> If there is a directory in there can you then cd in to that directory,
>> and do: "cat max_brightness" and then "echo value > brightness" (the latter
>> as root) with value being a number, once half of max_brightness, once
>> full brightness and see if this controls your backlight brightness.
>>
>> Assuming this test succeeds, is your problem resolved then? And if not
>> what is the problem?
>
> The problem is Julian is using a lightweight GUI that do not respond to
> backlight hotkey events. So he needs the in kernel processing of
> backlight events and for that to work, he has to add the
> acpi_osi="!Windows 2012" cmdline option.
I really think we don't want people like Julian to be passing
acpi_osi="!Windows 2012", just so that they may get a working acpi-video
backlight control (and possible a dozen of bad side-effects), just so that
they can use the brightness_switch_enabled=1 key processing.
AFAIK we all agree that the best way forward with backlight control on
Windows 8 laptops is not using acpi_osi="!Windows 2012", as that is a way
too big hammer, instead video.use_native_backlight=1 should be used which
is why we are making this the default in 3.16.
I realize that this does not fix Julian's problem. As I see it there are
2 separate problems here:
1) backlight control issues on Windows 8 laptops, this is what we are
trying to solve with video.use_native_backlight=1 (and without using
any acpi_osi override)
2) Some component in the stack needs to responds to backlight key-presses
and actually use the backlight control to change the backlight setting,
normally this is done by gnome / kde / unity / xfce, but what about users
not running those? For some of those users brightness_switch_enabled=1
has been making things work for them, but that only works if acpi-video
controls the backlight, which it does not do everywhere, and which we
want to get away from for Windows 8 laptops since it is just too broken
there.
Note that 2. is not limited to Windows 8 laptops / acpi-video in any
way, we've 23 non acpi-video backlight drivers under drivers/platform/x86/
alone + the native gpu backlight drivers. So what we really need is a
solution for any laptop not using acpi-video for backlight control and
not running one of the big 4 desktop environments.
Note that we pretty much have the same problem for any acpi event,
power button pressed, lid closed, etc. are all "key press" type
events typically handles by the desktop enviroment (e.g. we don't
automatically suspend on lid-close, we just tell userspace). And we already
have a solution for these type of events when running a desktop environment
which handles them, these get handled by acpid. So to me it seems that
the obvious (and one and only right) way to fix this is to teach acpid
to deal with brightness key-presses.
I'm willing to write a patch for acpid to implement this, and then
Julian's setup should just work without needing any special kernel
commandline options.
Julian would that be an acceptable solution for you, and would you be
willing to test such a patch ?
Regards,
Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
