On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 03:10:51PM +0200, Robert Richter wrote:
> On 13.06.14 13:02:58, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
>
> > @@ -811,6 +819,8 @@ static int ghes_notify_nmi(unsigned int cmd, struct pt_regs *regs)
> > int sev, sev_global = -1;
> > int ret = NMI_DONE;
> >
> > + BUG_ON(!IS_ENABLED(ARCH_HAS_ACPI_APEI_NMI));
> > +
>
> Now that we have the ARCH_HAS_ACPI_APEI_NMI option, group nmi code,
> put it in an #ifdef ... and make function stubs for the !nmi case
> where necessary. That code should moved to patch #2. If an arch does
> not support nmi code, we don't want to compile it into the kernel.
>
> Also this patch is quit a bit large and should further split into
> moving functional code into separate functions and the introduction of
> the notifier setup. This makes review much easier.
>
> I did not yet took a deep look into your notifier framework, but I
> don't really see a reason for the dynamic collection of function
> pointers in ghes_notify_tab. See below.
Ok, I'll wait out with further review after you've integrated Robert's
comments.
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
