On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 01:10:33PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wednesday, May 21, 2014 11:52:07 AM Mika Westerberg wrote: > > On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 02:44:14PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote: > > > For some ACPI device objects, they represent master devices, > > > and their children devices are enumerated by bus controller drivers > > > for the buses they are on. > > > > > > In this case, we do not want to enumerate their children devices to > > > platform bus explicitly in acpi scan code. > > > > > > Thus a new flag .is_master_device is introduced in this patch. > > > > > > For devices with this flag set, we will not do default enumeration > > > for their children. > > > > Is there any particular reason we would like to enumerate everything > > below the first device by default? > > Yes, there is. Device objects without _ADR under the PCI host bridge. OK. > Or we can skip the children under every *platform* device created by this by > default and mark the ones where we want the children to be enumerated as > platform devices too in a special way if needed. > > I guess we could try that (that was the Rui's original idea IIRC). That sounds better to me. I wonder if we can do this analogous to of_platform_bus_probe() and friends? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
