On Monday, May 19, 2014 05:44:47 PM Lan Tianyu wrote:
> On 05/19/2014 04:49 PM, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 07:48:34PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> >> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:16:09AM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:27:48PM +0800, Lan Tianyu wrote:
> >>>> This patch is to add CONFIG_I2C_ACPI. Current there is a race between
> >>>> removing I2C ACPI operation region and ACPI AML code accessing.
> >>>> So make i2c core built-in if CONFIG_I2C_ACPI is set.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> drivers/i2c/Kconfig | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
> >>>> drivers/i2c/Makefile | 2 +-
> >>>> include/linux/i2c.h | 2 +-
> >>>> 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/Kconfig b/drivers/i2c/Kconfig
> >>>> index 7b7ea32..c670d49 100644
> >>>> --- a/drivers/i2c/Kconfig
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/Kconfig
> >>>> @@ -2,7 +2,9 @@
> >>>> # I2C subsystem configuration
> >>>> #
> >>>>
> >>>> -menuconfig I2C
> >>>> +menu "I2C support"
> >>>> +
> >>>> +config I2C
> >>>> tristate "I2C support"
> >>>> select RT_MUTEXES
> >>>> ---help---
> >>>> @@ -21,6 +23,17 @@ menuconfig I2C
> >>>> This I2C support can also be built as a module. If so, the module
> >>>> will be called i2c-core.
> >>>>
> >>>> +config I2C_ACPI
> >>>> + bool "I2C ACPI support"
> >>>> + select I2C
> >>>> + depends on ACPI
> >>>> + default y
> >>>> + help
> >>>> + Say Y here if you want to enable I2C ACPI function. ACPI table
> >>>> + provides I2C slave devices' information to enumerate these devices.
> >>>> + This option also allows ACPI AML code to access I2C slave devices
> >>>> + via I2C ACPI operation region to fulfill ACPI method.
> >>>
> >>> I would prefer something like:
> >>>
> >>> Say Y here if you want to enable ACPI I2C support. This includes support
> >>> for automatic enumeration of I2C slave devices and support for ACPI I2C
> >>> Operation Regions. Operation Regions allow firmware (BIOS) code to
> >>> access I2C slave devices, such as smart batteries through an I2C host
> >>> controller driver.
> >>>
> >>> But it is really up to you so,
> >>>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> How does this fit into the context of
> >> 55e71edb81b2b45273e7b284cce13ff24bde846f ("i2c: move ACPI helpers into
> >> the core")?
> >
> > With that commit we moved ACPI code to live inside I2C module (given
> > that it was compiled as a module). However, you still can remove that
> > module from userspace.
> >
> > With this patch we make sure that the I2C core can't be removed if you
> > have ACPI enabled. This prevents the potential race.
> >
>
> Yes, these are the two patches' purposes. Thanks Mika's explanation. If you
> like, I can merge them into one patch.
I think that would be easier to follow.
Thanks!
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
