On 4/25/2014 5:24 PM, Myron Stowe wrote:
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 1:59 AM, Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Drop Andreas' old email address from CC as it keeps bouncing.
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 03:52:20PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
-static void __init pci_enable_pci_io_ecs(void)
+static void __init pci_enable_pci_io_ecs(u8 bus, u8 slot)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_AMD_NB
unsigned int i, n;
+ u8 limit;
for (n = i = 0; !n && amd_nb_bus_dev_ranges[i].dev_limit; ++i) {
- u8 bus = amd_nb_bus_dev_ranges[i].bus;
- u8 slot = amd_nb_bus_dev_ranges[i].dev_base;
- u8 limit = amd_nb_bus_dev_ranges[i].dev_limit;
+ /* Try matching for the bus range */
+ if ((bus != amd_nb_bus_dev_ranges[i].bus) ||
+ (slot != amd_nb_bus_dev_ranges[i].dev_base))
+ continue;
+
+ limit = amd_nb_bus_dev_ranges[i].dev_limit;
+ /* Setup all northbridges within the range */
for (; slot < limit; ++slot) {
u32 val = read_pci_config(bus, slot, 3, 0);
-
- if (!early_is_amd_nb(val))
+ if (!val)
continue;
val = read_pci_config(bus, slot, 3, 0x8c);
@@ -375,13 +457,14 @@ static void __init pci_enable_pci_io_ecs(void)
val |= ENABLE_CF8_EXT_CFG >> 32;
What a fun shifting!
Maybe you should do
#define ENABLE_CF8_EXT_CFG BIT(46 - 32)
to show exactly what you mean and how the bit is defined in MSR NB_CFG1
and also show how the high 32-bits are mapped into F3x8c, while at it.
And then you can drop the shifting at the call site.
Ok, I see another fun with this ECS enabling:
There's a enable_pci_io_ecs() which enables ECS through the NB_CFG MSR
which is called as part of the notifier *and* there's a PCI write to
that same bit in pci_enable_pci_io_ecs() which iterates over all NBs.
So, AFAICT, we do it twice and the second time is not needed. Which
means, you probably can drop pci_enable_pci_io_ecs() completely and use
solely the notifier?
It does look as if there is some duplication with respect to setting
MSR_AMD64_NB_CFG's (which is aliased at D18F3x8c [1])
ENABLE_CF8_EXT_CFG enable bit but there are at least a couple of
differences.
enable_pci_io_ecs() only sets the bit on one NB whereas
pci_enable_pci_io_ecs iterates over all the NBs (as you mentioned
above). The other difference has something to do with Xen; see the
origin of pci_enable_pci_io_ecs - commit 24d9b70b8.
Yes, no?
Suravee, Kim - either of you want to chime in here?
I believe the notifier is mainly for the cores which are initially
offline, and then brought up online afterward.
Suravee
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
