On Monday, April 14, 2014 05:11:15 PM Igor Mammedov wrote:
> acpi_processor_add() assumes that present at boot CPUs
> are always onlined, it is not so if a CPU failed to become
> onlined. As result acpi_processor_add() will mark such CPU
> device as onlined in sysfs and following attempts to
> online/offline it using /sys/device/system/cpu/cpuX/online
> attribute will fail.
>
> Do not poke into device internals in acpi_processor_add()
> and touch "struct device { .offline }" attribute, since
> for CPUs onlined at boot it's set by:
> topology_init() -> arch_register_cpu() -> register_cpu()
> before ACPI device tree is parsed, and for hotplugged
> CPUs it's set when userspace onlines CPU via sysfs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v2:
> - fix regression in v1 leading to NULL pointer dereference
> on CPU unplug, do not remove "pr->dev = dev;"
Yeah.
Does this patch depend on any other patches in the series?
I don't think so, but just asking.
If it doesn't, why is it part of this series at all?
> ---
> drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 1 -
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
> index c29c2c3..42d66f8 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
> @@ -404,7 +404,6 @@ static int acpi_processor_add(struct acpi_device *device,
> goto err;
>
> pr->dev = dev;
> - dev->offline = pr->flags.need_hotplug_init;
>
> /* Trigger the processor driver's .probe() if present. */
> if (device_attach(dev) >= 0)
>
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
