On Mon, 14 Apr 2014 16:51:19 +0200 Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > * Igor Mammedov <imammedo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Mon, 14 Apr 2014 12:03:35 +0200 > > Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > * Igor Mammedov <imammedo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, 14 Apr 2014 11:16:00 +0200 > > > > Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > * Igor Mammedov <imammedo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > /* > > > > > > + * wait for ACK from master CPU before continuing > > > > > > + * with AP initialization > > > > > > + */ > > > > > > + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cpu_initialized_mask); > > > > > > + while (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, cpu_callout_mask)) > > > > > > + cpu_relax(); > > > > > > > > > > > + /* > > > > > > + * wait for ACK from master CPU before continuing > > > > > > + * with AP initialization > > > > > > + */ > > > > > > + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cpu_initialized_mask); > > > > > > + while (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, cpu_callout_mask)) > > > > > > + cpu_relax(); > > > > > > > > > > That repetitive pattern could be stuck into a properly named helper > > > > > inline function. > > > > sure > > > > > > > > > (Also, before the cpumask_set_cpu() we should probably do a WARN_ON() > > > > > if the bit is already set.) > > > > WARN_ON will never be triggered here since bit is always cleared by > > master CPU before AP gets here. There is no harm keeping WARN_ON > > though, do you still want it be here? > > The previous code panic()ed on this condition - so it makes sense to > at least keep a WARN_ON(). That it won't ever trigger is good: > > > It could be useful to put WARN_ON in do_boot_cpu() before bit is > > cleared, so that user would see that he tries to online AP which has > > failed previous time. It's not really necessary since failed to > > online attempt reported in logs at ERR level now, see patch 2/5. > > WARN_ON()s are not used to communicate with users, they are used to > show developers that there's a _bug_ in the code! > > So a WARN_ON() not triggering, ever, is a good thing. Thanks for your patience I'll repost fixed and tested series in a minute > > Thanks, > > Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
