On Wed, 19 Mar 2014 14:10:53 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wednesday, March 19, 2014 07:51:45 AM Jean Delvare wrote: > > Hi Rafael, > > > > On Wed, 19 Mar 2014 02:26:52 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Monday, March 17, 2014 03:46:44 PM Jean Delvare wrote: > > > > From: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@xxxxxxx> > > > > Subject: ACPI: fix ACPI_VIDEO dependencies > > > > > > > > ACPI_VIDEO stopped depending on VIDEO_OUTPUT_CONTROL over 3 years ago > > > > (see commit 677bd810, "ACPI video: remove output switching control".) > > > > So it's about time to remove the Kconfig dependency between these two > > > > options. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@xxxxxxx> > > > > Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > Cc: Len Brown <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Do you want me to take this series? > > > > If other maintainers are OK with it, yes, I think that would be the > > easiest way. Thanks for proposing. All these patches depend on each > > other and must be applied in the right order, so pushing them through > > different trees would be slow at best, and risky. > > OK, I'll queue them up for 3.15 then, as I haven't seen any objections. Thank you :-) > > Also, thinking about it, I wonder if the first 3 patches of the series > > could go to longterm kernel series? While they do not fix any build > > breakage nor run-time bug, without them everyone (on x86 at least) is > > forced to build dead code. This is kind of frustrating. They are simple > > and obvious enough that hopefully there won't be any objection. > > I think it'll be best if you request the -stable people to pick > up those commits once they have reached the Linus' tree. Sure, I can do that. Thanks, -- Jean Delvare SUSE L3 Support -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
