> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wysocki, Rafael J
> Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2014 9:03 AM
> To: Zhang, Rui
> Cc: linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx; matthew.garrett@xxxxxxxxxx;
> dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 06/13] ACPI: introduce enumerable_id flag
> Importance: High
>
> On 3/13/2014 5:16 PM, Zhang Rui wrote:
> > Only certain kind of ACPI device objects can be enumerated via ACPI.
> > These ACPI device objects include
> > 1. ACPI device objects that have _HID control method.
> > 2. some ACPI device objects that have Linux specified HID strings.
> >
> > In order to distinguish those device objects from the others, a new
> > flag enumerable_id and a new function acpi_add_eid() are introduced
> in this patch.
>
> I don't really like the name of the new flag. What about calling it
> platform_id (it is supposed to indicate that the core should create a
> platform device for it)?
>
I concerned about the same problem, but could not get a better name.
Yes, platform_id sounds much better.
> > Currently, only devices with _HID method have this flag set.
> > And in the future, if a device that has Linux specified HID strings
> > wants to be enumerated to platform bus, acpi_add_eid() should be used
>
> And what about calling the new function acpi_add_platform_id()
> accordingly?
>
Agreed.
> > instead of acpi_add_id() when adding its Linux specified HID string.
>
> And I don't quite understand the last paragraph as a whole. Is it
> supposed to mean "if you want platform devices to be created for device
> objects without _HID, use acpi_add_platform_id() when adding artificial
> Linux-specific ID strings to them"?
>
Yes.
Currently, we use acpi_add_id() for devices like video, thermal, etc,
If we want to see them in platform bus, we just a one line change to
replace acpi_add_id() with acpi_add_platform_id().
Thanks,
rui
> > Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/acpi/scan.c | 8 +++++++-
> > include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 3 ++-
> > 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c index
> > 399257e..768f81d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > @@ -1679,6 +1679,12 @@ static void acpi_add_id(struct acpi_device_pnp
> *pnp, const char *dev_id)
> > pnp->type.hardware_id = 1;
> > }
> >
> > +static void acpi_add_eid(struct acpi_device_pnp *pnp, const char
> > +*dev_id) {
> > + acpi_add_id(pnp, dev_id);
> > + pnp->type.enumerable_id = 1;
> > +}
> > +
> > /*
> > * Old IBM workstations have a DSDT bug wherein the SMBus object
> > * lacks the SMBUS01 HID and the methods do not have the necessary
> "_"
> > @@ -1729,7 +1735,7 @@ static void acpi_set_pnp_ids(acpi_handle handle,
> struct acpi_device_pnp *pnp,
> > }
> >
> > if (info->valid & ACPI_VALID_HID)
> > - acpi_add_id(pnp, info->hardware_id.string);
> > + acpi_add_eid(pnp, info->hardware_id.string);
> > if (info->valid & ACPI_VALID_CID) {
> > cid_list = &info->compatible_id_list;
> > for (i = 0; i < cid_list->count; i++) diff --git
> > a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h index
> > 8c5e235..688ca44 100644
> > --- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> > +++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> > @@ -217,7 +217,8 @@ struct acpi_hardware_id {
> > struct acpi_pnp_type {
> > u32 hardware_id:1;
> > u32 bus_address:1;
> > - u32 reserved:30;
> > + u32 enumerable_id:1;
> > + u32 reserved:29;
> > };
> >
> > struct acpi_device_pnp {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
