On Thursday, March 06, 2014 11:54:28 AM Kieran Clancy wrote: > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thursday, March 06, 2014 11:04:14 AM Kieran Clancy wrote: > >> > >> Rafael, is it a separate process to get this in the stable tree or > >> will it naturally happen after being merged into the mainline? > > > > I need to add a proper "CC stable" tag to your patch for this to happen. > > > > Which -stable kernels should it go to? > > 3.2 and 3.10 seem like natural choices (3.4?), but I don't know the > norm for this kind of fix. Would there be any reason not to include it > in some particular stable kernels? In some cases patches are not needed in older -stable, because the changes are not relevant there etc. OK, I'll mark if for all applicable -stable series. Thanks! -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
