On Tuesday, March 04, 2014 12:53:05 PM Toshi Kani wrote: > On Sat, 2014-03-01 at 20:57 +0000, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > Since the only function executed by acpi_hotplug_execute() is > > acpi_device_hotplug() and it only is called by the ACPI core, > > simplify its definition so that it only takes two arguments, the > > ACPI device object pointer and event code, rename it to > > acpi_hotplug_schedule() and move its header from acpi_bus.h to > > the ACPI core's internal header file internal.h. Modify the > > definition of acpi_device_hotplug() so that its first argument is > > an ACPI device object pointer and modify the definition of > > struct acpi_hp_work accordingly. > > > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> > > The change looks good to me. I wonder if acpi_hotplug_schedule() should > still be in acpi/osl.c after this change, though. Well, not necessarily. :-) Still, that'd be a separate patch anyway. > Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@xxxxxx> Thanks! -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
