On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 10:23:16AM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 02:15:45AM +0000, Graeme Gregory wrote: > > +ACPI ARM64 > > That's a pretty broad statement for a single file. Is it core support, > architected peripherals, SoC? > Hi Catalin would changing the title to ACPI ARM64 Core Support be better in your mind. I do intend for the maintainership to cover just the plat/arm-core.c file. Graeme > > +M: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@xxxxxxxxxx> > > +M: Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@xxxxxxxxxx> > > +S: Supported > > +L: linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > +F: drivers/acpi/plat/arm-core.c > > This patch should be part of the series introducing the arm-core.c file > and it will be ACKed (or NAKed) following review. We can't really commit > maintainers to a file which does not exist in mainline and while there is > still feedback to be addressed. It's like a blank cheque. > > -- > Catalin > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
