On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 7:15 PM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 10:59:46AM +0000, Grant Likely wrote: >> I agree with merging it with the rest of the series, but comparing it >> to a blank cheque is not appropriate. Merely having an entry in >> MAINTAINERS doesn't immediately confer trust or ability to merge code, >> but it does tell people who to talk to when looking at ACPI on ARM. >> You can bet that neither Linus, Len or Rafael will merge ARM ACPI >> trees from them if you disagree. (And even if they did, you would >> yell, and Linus would revert it). > > If you want to know who to talk to regarding a subsystem then you use > get_maintainer.pl and/or git blame. Regardless of this patch, neither of > those tools will identify Graeme or Hanjun as the contacts for ACPI on ARM. > > I think we're in agreement, but just to spell it out: this patch should be > included at the end of a series adding the files which will be maintained. Yes, agreed. g. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
