On Friday, February 21, 2014 06:24:24 PM Catalin Marinas wrote: > Hi Rafael, > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 01:50:22AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Wednesday, February 19, 2014 12:23:55 AM Hanjun Guo wrote: > > > _PDC related stuff in processor_core.c is little bit X86/IA64 dependent, > > > rework the code to make it more arch-independent, no functional change > > > in this patch. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > I've queued up patches [1,3-5/5] from this series for 3.15 (modulo changelog > > modifications), but this one should be CCed to the x86 and ia64 maintainers. > > Thanks for taking these patches. I would however hold onto patch 3/5 as > this is still under discussion. Basically for patches specific to ARM > ACPI I would really like to see more acks before being merged as that's > a new thing for us. OK, I'll drop [3/5] for now, then. I'm wondering, though, whose ACKs I should be waiting for before applying those patches? Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
