On Thursday, February 20, 2014 11:44:34 AM Tomasz Nowicki wrote: > On 19.02.2014 17:11, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Wednesday, February 19, 2014 11:35:22 AM Tomasz Nowicki wrote: > >> This commit moves ISA-specific code to separate function and makes that > >> function depend on CONFIG_{E}ISA so that we do not have to maintain > >> acpi_isa_irq_to_gsi() function for architectures which do not support ISA. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- > >> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c > >> index 361b40c..0a553a0 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c > >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c > >> @@ -370,6 +370,30 @@ static struct acpi_prt_entry *acpi_pci_irq_lookup(struct pci_dev *dev, int pin) > >> return NULL; > >> } > >> > >> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ISA) || IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EISA) > >> +static int acpi_isa_register_gsi(struct pci_dev *dev) > >> +{ > >> + u32 dev_gsi; > >> + > >> + /* Interrupt Line values above 0xF are forbidden */ > >> + if (dev->irq > 0 && (dev->irq <= 0xF) && > >> + (acpi_isa_irq_to_gsi(dev->irq, &dev_gsi) == 0)) { > >> + dev_warn(&dev->dev, "PCI INT %c: no GSI - using ISA IRQ %d\n", > >> + pin_name(dev->pin), dev->irq); > >> + acpi_register_gsi(&dev->dev, dev_gsi, > >> + ACPI_LEVEL_SENSITIVE, > >> + ACPI_ACTIVE_LOW); > >> + return 0; > >> + } > >> + return -EINVAL; > >> +} > >> +#else > >> +static inline int acpi_isa_register_gsi(struct pci_dev *dev) > >> +{ > >> + return -ENODEV; > >> +} > >> +#endif > >> + > >> int acpi_pci_irq_enable(struct pci_dev *dev) > >> { > >> struct acpi_prt_entry *entry; > >> @@ -416,16 +440,7 @@ int acpi_pci_irq_enable(struct pci_dev *dev) > >> * driver reported one, then use it. Exit in any case. > >> */ > >> if (gsi < 0) { > >> - u32 dev_gsi; > >> - /* Interrupt Line values above 0xF are forbidden */ > >> - if (dev->irq > 0 && (dev->irq <= 0xF) && > >> - (acpi_isa_irq_to_gsi(dev->irq, &dev_gsi) == 0)) { > >> - dev_warn(&dev->dev, "PCI INT %c: no GSI - using ISA IRQ %d\n", > >> - pin_name(pin), dev->irq); > >> - acpi_register_gsi(&dev->dev, dev_gsi, > >> - ACPI_LEVEL_SENSITIVE, > >> - ACPI_ACTIVE_LOW); > >> - } else { > >> + if (acpi_isa_register_gsi(dev)) { > > > > The curly brackets are not necessary here and you can even move the below into > > acpi_isa_register_gsi(). > Right, the curly brackets can be removed. > > My intention was to print warning when ISA is not supported too, and do > not put dev_warn() into both version of acpi_isa_register_gsi(). So I > would leave code below as it is. OK -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html