On 02/18/2014 11:46 PM, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 04:22:27PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Tuesday, February 18, 2014 02:31:46 PM Takashi Iwai wrote:
>>> At Tue, 18 Feb 2014 12:34:42 +0200,
>>> Mika Westerberg wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 01:54:20PM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
>>>>> + {
>>>>> + .callback = video_set_use_native_backlight,
>>>>> + .ident = "HP EliteBook 2013 models",
>>>>> + .matches = {
>>>>> + DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "Hewlett-Packard"),
>>>>> + DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "HP EliteBook "),
>>>>> + DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, " G1"),
>>>>> + },
>>>>> + },
>>>>
>>>> I see my device is listed here but the above doesn't really use native
>>>> backlight because it is still in acpi_osi blacklist. Tried this and I can
>>>> see both acpi_video0 and intel_backlight listed under /sys/class/backlight.
>>>> Was this the intention?
>>>
>>> The acpi_osi blacklist commit (2d4054d84224) has to be reverted, as I
>>> mentioned earlier. But the revert can be done individually after
>>> merging this patch. Rafael, could you care?
>>
>> Done. Please check the result in linux-pm.git/linux-next.
>
> With your revert and this patch from Aaron, backlight on my HP EliteBook
> Revolve G1 works fine, thanks!
>
> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks for the test Mika and sorry for all the confusions caused.
-Aaron
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
