On 02/15/2014 06:21 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, February 14, 2014 05:26:01 PM Mika Westerberg wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 03:46:20PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: >>> The acpi_osi blacklist is just a workaround, and if we have better >>> solutions, it should be removed. That's why I'm asking it. >>> >>> So, after removing acpi_osi blacklist, and keeping your video >>> blacklist patch, the backlight works? >> >> Yes, the backlight works (there is only intel_backlight listed under >> /sys/class/backlight). >> >>> If yes, as mentioned, we should think of rather extending this video >>> blacklist to more EliteBook G1 and ProBook G1 machines, and remove >>> acpi_osi blacklist instead. >> >> Makes sense to me. (Well, I'm fine as long as backlight on my machine works >> ;-)) >> >> Aaron, Rafael, any comments on this? > > I generally agree with Takashi, but I'm not sure what to do for 3.14. I can re-base the previously sent patch titled: [PATCH] ACPI / video: Add systems that should favor native backlight interface And put Mika's system into the DMI table that will use native backlight interface in video module and remove it from video_detect's DMI table at the same time. Does this sound OK? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
