On 2014-1-17 22:25, Sudeep Holla wrote: > On 17/01/14 12:24, Hanjun Guo wrote: >> The _PDC (Processor Driver Capabilities) object provides OSPM a >> mechanism to convey to the platform the capabilities supported >> by OSPM for processor power management. >> >> OSPM evaluates _PDC prior to evaluating any other processor >> power management objects returning configuration information. >> >> This patch introduces the skeleton of _PDC related file to make >> ACPI core can be compiled on ARM64. >> >> Signed-off-by: Al Stone <al.stone@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h | 2 ++ >> arch/arm64/kernel/process.c | 3 +++ >> 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..cf19dc6 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h >> @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@ >> +/* >> + * Copyright (C) 2013, Al Stone <al.stone@xxxxxxxxxx> >> + * >> + * ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> + * >> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify >> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by >> + * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or >> + * (at your option) any later version. >> + * >> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, >> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of >> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the >> + * GNU General Public License for more details. >> + * >> + * ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> + */ >> + >> +#ifndef _ASM_ARM64_ACPI_H >> +#define _ASM_ARM64_ACPI_H >> + >> +static inline bool arch_has_acpi_pdc(void) >> +{ >> + return false; /* always false for now */ >> +} >> + >> +static inline void arch_acpi_set_pdc_bits(u32 *buf) >> +{ >> + return; >> +} >> + >> +#endif /*_ASM_ARM64_ACPI_H*/ >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h >> index 45b20cd..50ce951 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h >> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h >> @@ -162,6 +162,8 @@ static inline void spin_lock_prefetch(const void *x) >> >> #define HAVE_ARCH_PICK_MMAP_LAYOUT >> >> +extern unsigned long boot_option_idle_override; >> + >> #endif >> >> #endif /* __ASM_PROCESSOR_H */ >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c >> index de17c89..13d3d7f 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c >> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c >> @@ -89,6 +89,9 @@ void arch_cpu_idle_prepare(void) >> local_fiq_enable(); >> } >> >> +unsigned long boot_option_idle_override = IDLE_NO_OVERRIDE; >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(boot_option_idle_override); >> + > > This is what I mentioned in other email. Do we really foresee use of this in > ARM64 or it's just added to avoid build issues ? Just avoid build issues, can not foresee use of this in ARM64 :) Thanks Hanjun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html