On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 09:24:06 PM Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:37:02PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 04:06:01 PM Matthew Garrett wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 11:25:53PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > > > Queued up as a fix for 3.13 (I fixed up the indentation). > > > > > > Ah, sorry, I missed this chunk of the thread. If the system provides > > > valid _BIF data then we should possibly just fall back to that rather > > > than adding another quirk table. > > > > The problem is to know that _BIX is broken. If we could figure that out > > upfront, we woulnd't need the quirk table in any case. > > It's obvious that it is in this case - the package is the wrong size. Then Tianyu should be able to come up with a better fix relatively easily. :-) -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
