On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 03:37:57PM +0800, Lan Tianyu wrote: > The aml method _BIX of NEC LZ750/LS returns a broken package which > skip the first member "Revision" according ACPI 5.0 spec Table 10-234. Why don't we just ignore an invalid _BIX and fall back to _BIF? That seems more reasonable than setting a precedent for fixing up invalid data. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
