On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 06:55:51PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 18:55:51 +0100
> From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx, linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Chen, Gong"
> <gong.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ACPI, APEI: Cleanup alignment related codes for APEI
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
>
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 09:39:34AM -0500, Chen, Gong wrote:
> > erst record id cache is implemented in the memory to increase the
> > access speed via caching ERST content, so it doesn't matter with
> > firmware access.
>
> So what's with the memcpy in __erst_record_id_cache_add_one()?
>
I think you mean
...
memcpy(new_entries, entries,
erst_record_id_cache.len *
sizeof(entries[0]));
...
It is a copy from one integer array to another one(from old ID array
to new bigger ID array), so I can't use a simple evaluation to get this goal.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
