On 12/5/13, Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Yes, the AER tracepoint above should use the AER_* defines and not the
> HW_EVENT_ERR_* ones which are for memory errors.
>
> Wanna send a fix?
>
Yes. Does it translate into something like this?
From: Rui Wang <rui.y.wang@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 16:47:46 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] Fix severity usage in aer trace event
Signed-off-by: Rui Wang <rui.y.wang@xxxxxxxxx>
---
include/trace/events/ras.h | 8 ++++----
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/trace/events/ras.h b/include/trace/events/ras.h
index 88b8783..e2a17d8 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/ras.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/ras.h
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
#define _TRACE_AER_H
#include <linux/tracepoint.h>
-#include <linux/edac.h>
+#include <linux/aer.h>
/*
@@ -63,10 +63,10 @@ TRACE_EVENT(aer_event,
TP_printk("%s PCIe Bus Error: severity=%s, %s\n",
__get_str(dev_name),
- __entry->severity == HW_EVENT_ERR_CORRECTED ? "Corrected" :
- __entry->severity == HW_EVENT_ERR_FATAL ?
+ __entry->severity == AER_CORRECTABLE ? "Corrected" :
+ __entry->severity == AER_FATAL ?
"Fatal" : "Uncorrected",
- __entry->severity == HW_EVENT_ERR_CORRECTED ?
+ __entry->severity == AER_CORRECTABLE ?
__print_flags(__entry->status, "|", aer_correctable_errors) :
__print_flags(__entry->status, "|", aer_uncorrectable_errors))
);
--
1.7.5.4
Regards,
Rui
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
