> From: Rafael J. Wysocki [mailto:rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Friday, December 06, 2013 9:26 AM > > On Friday, December 06, 2013 01:08:45 AM Zheng, Lv wrote: > > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki [mailto:rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > > > Sent: Friday, December 06, 2013 6:37 AM > > > > > > On Thursday, December 05, 2013 07:26:37 PM Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > When build kernel with make W=1 we get the following compiler error. > > > > > > > > In file included from drivers/sfi/sfi_acpi.c:66:0: > > > > include/linux/sfi_acpi.h: In function ‘acpi_sfi_table_parse’: > > > > include/linux/sfi_acpi.h:72:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘acpi_table_parse’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > > > > if (!acpi_table_parse(signature, handler)) > > > > ^ > > > > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors > > > > > > > > The patch changes acpi/acpi.h inclusion to linux/acpi.h. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > OK > > > > > > Lv, I'm dropping your patch cleaning up the inclusions, please sort that thing > > > out entirely for the next cycle. > > > > No, I think Andy's patch is wrong. > > His patch may be wrong, but the warning in his changelog surely is real. :-) > > > This warning is existing before merging my fixes. > > > > Either we fix this warning or leave it as is. > > > > To fix it, you need to add 1 line in sfi_acpi.h rather than change the line. > > Let me post a fix for this. > > Please do. And I'm putting all ACPI header cleanups on hold until all warnings > of this kind have been fixed by them. Otherwise doing those cleanups makes a > little sense in my opinion. OK, not only this warning, there is another warning in sfi_acpi.c. I doubt whether they are strictly tested before upstreamed... They are all existing warnings. You can apply my new patch before the cleanup series. Thanks -Lv > > Thanks, > Rafael ��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{�����ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
