On Tuesday 03 December 2013, Hanjun Guo wrote: > + /* > + * ACPI have no bindings to indicate SPI or PPI, so we > + * use different mappings from DT in ACPI. > + * > + * For FDT > + * PPI interrupt: in the range [0, 15]; > + * SPI interrupt: in the range [0, 987]; > + * > + * For ACPI, using identity mapping for hwirq: > + * PPI interrupt: in the range [16, 31]; > + * SPI interrupt: in the range [32, 1019]; This difference might cause endless confusion. Can't you register PPI and SPI as separate IRQ controllers to have the same number space that we normally have? Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
